Legal Opinion

Winder Bros. v. Sterling

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1929No. Motion No. 8405; No. 1127-5064PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

Relators in their motion for rehearing complain that we did not pass “upon applicant’s contention that the statute * * * is violative of the Constitution of the United States, as amended by the Fifteenth Amendment thereto.” We assume that counsel intended to refer to the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Be that as it may, no reference to the Federal Constitution is made in the petition in mandamus.

But if the contention were made, the re-suits stated in our original opinion for denying the claim of lack of due process required in the state Constitution would cause us to make a…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Texas Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Texas Power & Light Company v. City of GarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. LovettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Garrett v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Central Power and Light Company v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API