Legal Opinion
Yazzie v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 3, 2022No. 3:20-cv-08348Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Bruce Yazzie, No. CV-20-08348-PCT-DLR 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment, which are fully 16 briefed. (Docs. 12, 13, 14, 15.) The Court grants summary judgment for Defendant Office 17 of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (“ONHIR”) and denies summary judgment for 18 Plaintiff Bruce Yazzie. 19 I. Legal Background 20 In 1977, land that was jointly used by the Navajo and Hopi tribes was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leonardo S. ORTEZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Clinton v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Sacora v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Crickon v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Forest Guardians v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2004