Legal Opinion

Albert J. Velasquez v. Dorothy J. Frapwell and the Trustees of Indiana University, and United States of America, Intervening

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 20, 1999No. 98-1547, 98-2034PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

In our opinion in this case issued on November 12, 1998, and reported at 160 F.3d 389 (7th Cir.1998), we held that the plaintiffs claim under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301 et seq., against the Trustees of Indiana University, an arm of the State of Indiana, was barred by the Eleventh Amendment. Later we learned that on the day before our decision was issued, Congress had amended USERRA in the Veterans Programs Enhancement Act of 1998, Pub.L. No. 105-368 (Nov. 11, 1998). We asked the parties to submit supplemental memoranda concerning…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Albert J. Velasquez v. Dorothy J. Frapwell and the Trustees of Indiana University, and United States of America, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Steven J. Holman and Karen L. Holman v. State of Indiana and Indiana Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Townsend v. University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. McIntosh v. PartridgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. Larkins v. Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Dees v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API