Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson v. Pineda

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2010No. 2010-1116PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, John A. Johnson, for a writ of habeas corpus. Res judicata bars Johnson from filing a successive habeas corpus petition insofar as he raises claims that he either raised or could have raised in his previous petitions. Keith v. Kelley, 125 Ohio St.3d 161, 2010-Ohio-1807, 926 N.E.2d 646, ¶ 1; State ex rel. Johnson v. Hudson, 118 Ohio St.3d 308, 2008-0hio-2451, 888 N.E.2d 1090; Johnson v. Mitchell (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 123, 707 N.E.2d 471. Res judicata “is applicable to successive habeas corpus petitions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Childs v. LazaroffOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Johnson v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Keith v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State ex rel. Johnson v. HudsonOhio Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goins v. PinedaOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Taylor v. BradshawOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API