State ex rel. Johnson v. Pineda
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, John A. Johnson, for a writ of habeas corpus. Res judicata bars Johnson from filing a successive habeas corpus petition insofar as he raises claims that he either raised or could have raised in his previous petitions. Keith v. Kelley, 125 Ohio St.3d 161, 2010-Ohio-1807, 926 N.E.2d 646, ¶ 1; State ex rel. Johnson v. Hudson, 118 Ohio St.3d 308, 2008-0hio-2451, 888 N.E.2d 1090; Johnson v. Mitchell (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 123, 707 N.E.2d 471. Res judicata “is applicable to successive habeas corpus petitions…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State ex rel. Childs v. LazaroffOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Johnson v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Keith v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State ex rel. Johnson v. HudsonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goins v. PinedaOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Taylor v. BradshawOhio Court of Appeals · 2016