Goins v. Pineda
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the motion of appellant, Dana Goins, for leave to file a second petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Res judicata bars Goins from filing a successive habeas corpus petition to raise claims that he raised or could have raised in his previous petition. See State ex rel. Johnson v. Pineda, 126 Ohio St.3d 480, 2010-Ohio-4387, 935 N.E.2d 38, ¶ 1. 1
Judgment affirmed.
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
1. We deny appellant’s motion for oral argument.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Johnson v. PinedaOhio Supreme Court · 2010
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hazel v. KnabOhio Supreme Court · 2011