Legal Opinion

Goins v. Pineda

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2011No. 2010-1736PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the motion of appellant, Dana Goins, for leave to file a second petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Res judicata bars Goins from filing a successive habeas corpus petition to raise claims that he raised or could have raised in his previous petition. See State ex rel. Johnson v. Pineda, 126 Ohio St.3d 480, 2010-Ohio-4387, 935 N.E.2d 38, ¶ 1. 1

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

1. We deny appellant’s motion for oral argument.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. PinedaOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hazel v. KnabOhio Supreme Court · 2011