Legal Opinion

Sewell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 6, 1955No. 35635PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.

In our opinion, Sloan v. State, 68 Ga. App. 92 (1, 2) (22 S. E. 2d 333), is applicable in several respects to the case here involved. Those headnotes read: “1. In a trial on an accusation for simple larceny, charging theft of motor vehicle tires, the description of the property involved, including the serial numbers of the tires, was sufficiently proved where the evidence detailed the description as alleged save the serial numbers, and further detailed that the tires lost and recovered were the same tires as the ones described 'in counts 1 and 2 of this accusation.’

“2. There are two reasons…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. May v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  2. Porch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Nightengale v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. Sloan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burkett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Burkett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API