Legal Opinion

Nightengale v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 5, 1894PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Indictment for simple larceny. Before Judge Sweat. Camden superior court. November term, 1893.

1Opinion of the Court

The indictment alleged that the defendants, on September 6, 1892, in Camden county, “ one animal of the female sex and of that species of animals known as cattle, red in color, marked crop in each ear and branded with the letter ‘ P,’ of the personal goods of D. B. Proe*396tor, and of the value of $12.00, unlawfully, wrongfully and fraudulently, did take and carry away with intent to steal the same.” Defendants demurred on the grounds, that the indictment alleges no offence, and that the description of the property alleged to have been stolen is insufficient. The demurrer was overruled.

D. R.…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Rawlings v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Burkett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Clarke v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API