Legal Opinion

Cole v. Arlington State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1898No. 8039Published

Error from the district court of Washington county. Tried below before Key sor, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNoryal, J.

Charles D. Cole instituted two' actions of replevin to' recover certain chattels, one being against the Arlington State Bank, and the other against the Blair State Bank. The causes were consolidated and tried as one action. The verdict was for the defendants, and from the judgment entered thereon plaintiff has prosecuted this proceeding.

*633The three assignments argued in the brief filed relate to the rulings of the court below on the admission of evidence, and they cannot be considered, since there is no bill of exceptions included in the transcript. (Sweeney v. Ramge, 46 Neb. 919; Reed v. Rice,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. GerholdNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Corey v. Plummer, Perry & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Stuart v. BurchamNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Sweeney v. RamgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Reed v. RiceNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API