Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1955No. 4953PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board instituted this proceeding for the enforcement of its order issued against the respondents who were engaged as a co-partnership in the wholesale distribution of automotive parts and accessories in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The Board found that the respondents had unjustifiably refused to recognize and bargain collectively with the International Association of Machinists, AFL, herein referred to as the Union, as the exclusive representative of their employees in an appropriate unit in violation of Section 8(a) (5) of the Act, and that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Brooks v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- International Association of MacHinists Tool and Die Makers Lodge No. 35 v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Furr's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Vapor Blast Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- National Labor Relations Board v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hannaford Bros. Co. (T. R. Savage Division)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hannaford Bros. Co. (T. R. Savage Division)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959