Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Stewart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Lenawee. (Lane, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff is the widow of Charles M. Wheeler, deceased. December 20, 1888, Wheeler entered into a written contract with the defendant to buy a one-third interest in his celery farm. Wheeler agreed to live upon the farm, and give his undivided attention to the business conducted thereon, and this was stated in the contract to be a large inducement for Stewart to make the sale. It was further agreed that, if Wheeler became unable to attend to the business before his interest was paid for, Stewart should refund to him all money paid by him, one-third of the expense money paid by Wheeler, and a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pipp v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Peet v. Great Camp of the Knights of the Maccabees of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Signs v. Bush's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Edwards v. ThomanMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Randall v. Detroit & Northwestern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Rostad v. Chicago Suburban Water & Light Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API