Legal Opinion
Shea v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 1935No. Civ. 10024PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs recovered judgment against defendant for work done in connection with construction of a storm drain and defendant appeals.
The plans for the storm drain showed a sanitary sewer below and parallel to a portion of the storm drain. While excavating this portion plaintiffs discovered leakage from the sewer due to defects in it and too great pressure, so that the trench was flooded and the sides caved in. Complaint was made to the board of public works of defendant city and with their approval and under their direction plaintiff pumped out the water and went ahead with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Horgan v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Sundstrom v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- M. L. Ryder Building Co. v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Thilemann v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- James Pilkington Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thomas Kelly & Sons, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- North Shore Sewer & Water, Inc. v. Corbetta Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- North Shore Sewer And Water, Inc. v. Corbetta Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968