Legal Opinion

People v. Graham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1987Published

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed on the law, motion denied and indictment reinstated. Memorandum: The court erred in granting defendant’s oral motion to dismiss the indictment. "A motion to dismiss an indictment pursuant to CPL 210.20 must be made in writing and upon reasonable notice to the people” (CPL 210.45 [1]; People v De Rosa, 42 NY2d 872; People v Jack, 117 AD2d 753). Here, the prosecutor did not waive his right to have the motion made on papers, and with notice (cf., People v Lebensfeld, 82 AD2d 925) but, instead, asserted that one of the grounds upon which he opposed the motion was the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. De RosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. JackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. LebensfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API