People v. De Rosa
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Order of the Appellate Term affirmed.
The issue in this case did not turn on denial of a speedy trial. Had it been so, the failure of defendant to follow the procedure under CPL 210.20, 210.45 would sustain the reversal by the Appellate Term. Nor was the procedure at the trial court appropriate for a dismissal in the furtherance of justice under CPL 170.30 (subd 1, pars [e], [g]) (CPL 170.45). The correct issue was the abrupt refusal of the trial court on calendar call to allow an adjournment until 2:00 p.m. of the day previously set for trial. This, on the conceded facts and…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Holtzman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. DouglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hynes v. GeorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. FattizziAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.