(PC) Witt v. Solano County Custody Division
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY JAMAL WITT, No. 2:22-cv-1042 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SOLANO COUNTY CUSTODY DIVISION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This 18 proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 19 Plaintiff requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. As plaintiff has submitted a 20 declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), his request will be granted. 21 When…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.