Miami Hardware Paint & Glass Co. v. Magic City Building Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
After the two original defendants had filed their joint answer, the complainant filed a demurrer to the fourth “count” of the answer. This paragraph of the answer alleged that the mortgage sought to be foreclosed was without consideration and prayed that the same be declared void and cancelled. Demurrer was not the method of attacking this portion of the answer. The proper method was by exceptions, or by motion to strike out under the statute. Oneida Land Co. v. Richards, 73 Fla., 884, 75 So. R. 412; See. 3122 and 3124 Rev. Gen. Stats. This demurrer was set down for hearing, but the record…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ballard v. KennedySupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
- Lee v. Bradley Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1902
- Griffith v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Onedia Land Co. v. RichardSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norris Et Ux. v. EikenberrySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Phillips v. Lindsay Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Whitehurst v. May, Et. Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933