Legal Opinion

State v. Hollenbeck

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1991No. 12518PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Judge.

The issue presented by this case is whether an attorney who is part of the Medicaid Providers Fraud Control Unit (MPFCU), which is funded by a legislative appropriation to the state auditor, may prosecute a criminal sexual penetration case for a local district attorney. We hold that, under the circumstances of this case, he may not. Accordingly, we reverse defendant’s conviction and remand.

By way of background, the MPFCU is organized pursuant to federal law. To encourage the states to develop MPFCUs and thus prosecute, under state law, fraud in the provision of medicaid…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zurla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. BlevinsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Candelaria v. RobinsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Alvarez v. Board of Trustees of La Union TownsiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. Fischer, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ArellanoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Fernandez v. Char-Li-Jon, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. CherryhomesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. SurrattNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API