Legal Opinion
Dietz v. Baker
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 13, 2007No. Civ. 06-256-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Nancy S. Dietz (“plaintiff’) brought suit against defendants James M. Baker (“Mayor Baker”), individually and in his official capacity as the Mayor of the City of Wilmington, and the City of Wilmington (“City”) (collectively, “defendants”) asserting violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 and Title VII. (D.I. 1 at 1-2) More specifically, plaintiff claims that defendants violated her rights when they failed to promote her to the rank of inspector because they maintained an illegal racial quota system, and engaged in…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Beberman v. BlinkenDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2023
- YOUNG v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AND COUNTY OF GLOUCESTERDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020