Legal Opinion

Pratte v. Balatsos

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 20, 1955No. 4368PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

The terms of the contract between the plaintiff and Larochelle are not in dispute. It provided that in return for payment of forty per cent of the income from the record player, the plaintiff might install it in “a prominent and convenient part of . . . [Larochelle’s] place of business” and that “said machine shall be operated during the term of this Agreement [fourteen years and six months] and that no similar equipment nor any other kind of coin-operated machine will be installed or operated on said premises by anyone else.” Thus it was intended by the parties to the agreement that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baseball Publishing Co. v. BrutonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Standard Fashion Co. v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Horace Case v. Arthur E. MorrisetteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Caullett v. Stanley Stilwell & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Smith v. Wedgewood Builders Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API