Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dannelly

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1932No. 4 Div. 876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

This was a suit, resulting in a judgment in favor of appellee, by 'him, in detinue, against appellant, for the recovery of the possession of “110 Babbit Hutches,” alleged to have been manufactured by the plaintiff (appellee) and sold and delivered to appellant.

The case was tried before the court, sitting without a jury.

The principal question argued here is the propriety, vel non, of the said court’s rendering, on the facts shown, judgment in favor of appellee.

Appellant cites, and relies upon, for a reversal of the judgment, the case of Neal, Morse & Co. v. Boggan, 97 Ala. 611, 11 So. 809,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Saunders v. KohnkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. Drake v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Parker v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Neal, Morse & Co. v. BogganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. DannellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Smith v. DannellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API