Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dannelly

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 28, 1932No. 4 Div. 639PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner here seeks to review that feature of the opinion of the Court of Appeals, 141 So. 568, which holds that appellant cannot secure a reversal of the judgment of the circuit court to the extent that it overruled appellant's motion to require appellee to give security for the costs, because appellee recovered a judgment in that court. The motion is made upon the theory that appellee was a non-resident, and filed the suit without security, as provided by section 7249, Code, and recovered a judgment. The opinion of the Court of Appeals, based upon a statement to that effect in our case of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. CheneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  2. Brown v. Bamberger, Bloom & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Ex parte BradshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Derzis v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Heflin v. Rock Mills Manufacturing & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Fiscus v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API