Smith v. Dannelly
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioner here seeks to review that feature of the opinion of the Court of Appeals, 141 So. 568, which holds that appellant cannot secure a reversal of the judgment of the circuit court to the extent that it overruled appellant's motion to require appellee to give security for the costs, because appellee recovered a judgment in that court. The motion is made upon the theory that appellee was a non-resident, and filed the suit without security, as provided by section 7249, Code, and recovered a judgment. The opinion of the Court of Appeals, based upon a statement to that effect in our case of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First National Bank v. CheneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Brown v. Bamberger, Bloom & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Ex parte BradshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Derzis v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Heflin v. Rock Mills Manufacturing & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Taylor v. MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Fiscus v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942