Legal Opinion

Neal v. Wisconsin Hard Chrome, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided September 29, 2005No. 06-05-00049-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice ROSS.

Jimmy R. Neal appeals from a summary judgment taken against him in his personal injury lawsuit against Wisconsin Hard Chrome, Inc., d/b/a Texas Hard Chrome, Inc. and/or Texas Hard Chrome, Inc. (Chrome). He alleged that Chrome’s negligence exposed him to heavy metals, chemicals, and other toxic substances, while Chrome asserted that the action was barred because Chrome was a subscriber under the Workers’ Compensation Act, and thus Neal’s exclusive remedy was under the Act. Neal contends that Chrome was not his employer and that Chrome was thus subject to tort…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Marshall v. ViseTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Wingfoot Enterprises v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Garza v. Exel Logistics, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Fort Bend Central Appraisal District v. Hines Wholesale NurseriesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. ReadyOne Industries, Inc. v. Joel Antonio Flores, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014
  2. Resurgence Financial, LLC v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  3. In the Interest of N.L.W.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Cynthia Martin v. Hopkins County, Hopkins County Judge Robert Newsom, Hopkins County Commissioner Mickey Barker, Hopkins County Commissioner Greg Anglin, Hopkins County Commissioner Wade Bartley, and Hopkins County Commissioner Joe Price, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2022
  5. Garry Wade Crossley v. Karen Kay Crossley, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API