Carawan v. Tate
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*164WEBB, Judge.
We consider first the defendants’ appeal. The defendants assign error to testimony by the plaintiff and a police officer that Mr. Tate was convicted in district court of assaulting the plaintiff, Mr. Tate having pled not guilty to the criminal charge. We believe this assignment of error has merit. In this jurisdiction evidence of a person’s conviction in a criminal prosecution for the very act which constitutes the basis of liability in a civil action for damages is not admissible in the civil action. Tidwell v. Booker, 290 N.C. 98, 225 S.E. 2d 816 (1976); Beanblossom v. Thomas,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Robertson Ex Rel. Robertson v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Clemmons v. Life Insurance Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Tidwell v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Allred v. GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Beanblossom v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Medlin v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- John Michael Borneman v. United States of America, John Michael Borneman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Mazza v. HuffakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Shaver v. N. C. Monroe Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Maintenance Equipment Co., Inc. v. Godley BuildersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.