Legal Opinion
Tartaro v. La Conte
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 26, 1969PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
The decisive question in this case was whether the plaintiff’s services, reasonably worth $150 a week as chef and manager of a restaurant, were, as the plaintiff claimed, rendered to the named defendant as the owner of the business with the expectation of both parties that the plaintiff was to be compensated for them by the named defendant, hereinafter called the defendant, or whether, as the defendant claimed, the parties were partners in the operation of the restaurant, and the plaintiff had no expectation of compensation from the defendant but only such reward as might arise from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kearns v. AndreeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Freda v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Faiola v. FaiolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Grote v. A. C. Hine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Metz v. Hvass Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Town of Branford Sewer Authority v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Gutowski v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Jonathan Woodner Co. v. LauferDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Time Finance Corp. v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969
- Logan v. LenhartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.