Moss v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Circuit Judge:
The petitioners challenge a rule issued by the Federal Power Commission by Orders Nos. 455 and 455-A, pursuant to a rulemaking procedure in Commission Docket No. R-441.
I
The notice of proposed rulemaking in Docket No. R-441 proposed to amend the Commission’s General Rules of Practice and Procedure by inserting a new “Section 2.75 Optional Procedure for Certificating New Producer Sales of Natural Gas”. In the notice the Commission disclaimed any intention to supersede existing area rate procedures or decisions. The notice referred to the gap between the supply of natural gas…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States Lines, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, Hapag-Lloyd A. G., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Shell Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, and Consolidated Cases. In Re National Rate Cases for New GasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Public Service Commission for the State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Tenneco Oil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Nos. 76-2960Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Ecee, Inc. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.