City of Tucson v. Walker
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStanford, J.
Plaintiff brings this action on four grounds asking that the court below adjudge and declare Ordinance No. 691, of the defendant City of Tucson, void, invalid and unconstitutional in so far as it provides:(1) For death benefits payable in part by the City.(2) For joint survivorship annuities payable in part by said City.(3) For the investment of the pension fund created under said Ordinance in the purchase of the annuities and other benefits therein provided.(4) For a pension fund for members of the Police Department of the City of Tucson in lieu of the Police Pension Act of 1937, Laws 1937,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Axberg v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- State ex rel. Garner v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Luhrs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Tucson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- Shaffer v. AlltCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- City of Tucson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- City of Tucson, City of Phoenix v. State of Arizona Ken BennettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.