Legal Opinion

Permian Corp. v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 29, 1980No. M-11825PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Permian Corporation has filed a “Motion to Sustain Jurisdiction” in an attempted appeal in which our Clerk has refused to file the transcript because the order from which the attempted appeal has been made is not a final judgment. The motion is denied.

In May, 1979, W. R. Davis filed a suit for himself and on behalf of a class of persons against The Permian Corporation in the District Court of Midland County. After an answer was filed and a hearing was had, the Court entered an order on January 30, 1980, certifying the suit as a class action pursuant to Rule 42, Tex.R.Civ.P. No…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. In Re General Motors Corporation Engine Interchange LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Walton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  2. Taylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  3. De Los Santos v. Occidental Chemical Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
  4. Harmon Luther Taylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  5. Harmon Luther Taylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API