Craig v. Renaker
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Clay
Affirming.
The principal question on this appeal is whether the statute requiring a license fee of druggists for selling spirituous and vinous liquors has been repealed by the prohibition acts of 1920 and 1922.
The question arises in the following way: Renaker, a druggist, who had complied with all the provisions of law necessary to enable him to sell whiskey for medicinal purposes, and had obtained a permit to do so, was required by the state authorities to obtain a license for which he paid the necessary fee for two years. Proceeding under section .162,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vigliotti v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
- Greene v. Taylor, Jr. & SonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Boswell & Rose v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
- Tabor v. LanderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Swiss Oil Corp. v. ShanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- City of Morganfield v. WathenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Coleman, State Aud. v. Consolidated Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Coleman, Auditor v. Inland Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.