Legal Opinion

Craig v. Renaker

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 21, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

The principal question on this appeal is whether the statute requiring a license fee of druggists for selling spirituous and vinous liquors has been repealed by the prohibition acts of 1920 and 1922.

The question arises in the following way: Renaker, a druggist, who had complied with all the provisions of law necessary to enable him to sell whiskey for medicinal purposes, and had obtained a permit to do so, was required by the state authorities to obtain a license for which he paid the necessary fee for two years. Proceeding under section .162,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Vigliotti v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  3. Greene v. Taylor, Jr. & SonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Boswell & Rose v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  5. Tabor v. LanderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Swiss Oil Corp. v. ShanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. City of Morganfield v. WathenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Coleman, State Aud. v. Consolidated Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Coleman, Auditor v. Inland Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API