Caristo Construction Corp. v. Diners Financial Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalter R.. Hart, J.
The action herein seeks to charge defendant with moneys which were trust funds as defined by the Lien Law, alleged to have been diverted to defendant with knowledge of their trust character.
Plaintiff moves pursuant to CPLR 3211, 3212 to strike out defendant’s two affirmative defenses and for summary judgment and an assessment of counsel fees. Prom the pleadings, affidavits and exhibits submitted on the motion, the following facts appear:
On September 16, 1959 plaintiff as general contractor entered into a contract for construction on and alterations of premises of the Victory Memorial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1943
- Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Karpas v. BandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Schwarz v. General Aniline & Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Bernstein v. KritzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Central Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Bottenus v. BlackmanNew York Supreme Court · 1972