Legal Opinion
Karpas v. Bandler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 3, 1926PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.
This is an application for a summary judgment — plaintiff succeeded at the Special Term — and from the order directing the entry of summary judgment, defendant appeals.
The plaintiff is suing upon a promissory note in the sum of $25,000 made by the defendant to the order of one S. M. Goldberg and which note, the complaint alleges, was indorsed and delivered by Goldberg to the plaintiff for value before maturity. The complaint further sets forth the usual allegations of due presentation for payment, refusal to pay and protest.
The answer denies the allegations as to delivery and consideration,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Hanna v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Hanna v. . MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Vogel v. PyneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
3Cited by19 opinions
- Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Agnew v. LibbyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1943
- Harter v. Peoples Bank of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- National Bank of North America v. DeLuxe Poster Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.