Hendricks-Pearce v. State, Department of Corrections
Alaska Supreme Court
1DissentFabe, Chief Justice
In my view, the court's interpretation of AS 88.30.028 is incorrect, and traditional methods of statutory construction-looking to the statute's text, legislative history and purpose, longstanding interpretations of administrative regulations, and policy considerations-all require the opposite interpretation. I would hold that AS 88.80.028 does not render a prisoner lacking collateral resources enumerated in subsection (a) personally liable for the costs of medical care obtained from outside providers. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent and do not join the plurality opinion.1
*40Alaska Statute…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Marathon Oil Co. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Kodiak Island Borough v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. ARMAOSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.