Commonwealth v. ARMAO
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
We must here decide whether the Pennsylvania statute pertaining to criminal libel, Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, §412, 18 P.S. §4412, 1 and the Act of April 11, 1901, P. L. 74, §1, 19 P.S. §801, 2 as modified by Article I, Section 7 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, 3 is of any further force or effect in light of a series of recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court concerning libel and the First Amendment. 4 Upon review we find that neither the statutes nor the last sentence of Article I, Section 7, comport with our basic federal constitutional…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Mangual v. Rotger-SabatCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Wolfe, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Curran v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Gottschalk v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.