Sawyer v. Foremost Dairy Products Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) In view of what we shall hereafter say, the rulings on the evidence were not of sufficient importance, even if the court erred, to warrant a reversal. However, under the ruling of this court in Smith v. Odom, 63 Ga. 499, we find no error in the rulings of the court as to the evidence. It seems to be well settled that whether fixtures have become attached to the realty as a part thereof, and not merely for incidental, transitory use, depends upon the intention of the parties vested with the ownership or use thereof. It is a familiar rule that the effect of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. OdomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Thrower v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Horton v. StoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Sikes v. SikesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
3Cited by10 opinions
- Manderson & Associates, Inc. v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Babson Credit Plan, Inc. v. Cordele Production Credit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Kirkland v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Homac Inc. v. Fort Wayne Mortgage Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
- Hargrove v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.