Legal Opinion

McDonnell v. Juvenile Court

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 13, 1993No. 93SA175PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

In this original proceeding the petitioners seek relief in the nature of prohibition and assert that we should invoke our general superintending power. 1 The petitioners also seek to prevent the respondent judge from using the contempt power to force compliance with his orders. We issued a rule to show cause and now make the rule absolute.

I

The juvenile court, in three separate cases, committed C.W., J.M., and E.H. to the Department of Institutions (DOI). 2 In each case, the court ordered the DOI not to send the juvenile to the Glen Mills School in Concordville, Pennsylvania. In the orders…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Colorado General Assembly v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Mac Manus v. LoveSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. People v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Whittington v. BraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Department of Corrections v. PenaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. Juvenile Court, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. White v. AdamekColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People In the Interest of P.KColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Meredith v. ZavarasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API