Legal Opinion

Chase v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 28, 1930PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was brought by appellant, hereinafter referred to as complainant, to foreclose a purchase money mortgage made by defendants to complainant.

Defendants in their answer sought to have the mortgage and notes reformed, so as to set forth therein an agreement between defendants and complainant's agent, who negotiated the sale of the mortgaged lands to defendants, and attended to the closing of the deal, to the effect that the lands described in the mortgage should alone be responsible for the debt, a clause having been inserted for that purpose, which failed to express the intended…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Capital City Bank v. HilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  2. Jacobs v. ParodiSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  3. Fagan v. Robbins Ex Rel. RobbinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. Branford State Bank v. Howell Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1924

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Love v. Brown Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Meyer v. Nator Holding Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. NickersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Younghusband v. Fort Pierce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Heisler v. Florida Mortgage Title & Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API