Legal Opinion

Milliken v. Gray

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1969No. Civ. 34775PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, J. pro tem. *

Factual Background

On January 26, 1968, the appellants filed a complaint for damages based on a contractual obligation in the Municipal CoUrt of the Pasadena Judicial District.

On February 10, 1969, the respondent filed a notice of motion to transfer this matter to the superior court on the grounds that the complaint seeks damages in an amount heyond the jurisdiction of a municipal court. On February 19, 1969, the trial court granted the respondent’s motion to transfer. On February 24, 1969, the appellants filed a notice of appeal with the Appellate Department of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Muller v. ReaghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Arganbright v. GoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. In Re ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Hennigan v. BorenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. K.R.L. Partnership v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Ash v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Hovik Nazaryan v. FemtoMetrix, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
  5. The Cal. Gun Rights Foundation v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API