Legal Opinion

People v. New Horizons, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 18, 1980No. 28038, 28096, 28136, 28200, 28413 and 79SA322PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

In these appeals, which have been consolidated for the purposes of this opinion, we are called upon to determine the constitutionality of the Colorado Obscenity Statute, section 18-7-101, C.R.S. 1973 (now in 1978 Repl. Vol. 8), et seq. The defendants in People v. Skinner, People v. Royale and People v. G.N.A., Inc., were charged with promoting obscene material, pursuant to section 18-7-103, C.R.S. 1973, and conspiracy to promote obscene material, pursuant to section 18-2-201, C.R.S. 1973 (now in 1978 Repl. Vol. 8), which provide the foundation for the constitutional claim that the statute…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Bryers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. People v. TabronSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Tooley v. Seven Thirty-Five East Colfax, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. People v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. People v. FordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Passarelli v. SchoettlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. Passarelli v. SchoettlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API