Cherpinsky v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted of the offense of robbery from the person, and were sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of 23 years. Defendants bring to this court for review the record of their conviction.
Defendants contend that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict, on the ground that they were not sufficiently identified as the perpetrators of the robbery. The following pertinent facts are established:
August Tews was the assistant manager of Paramount Publix Corporation and, as such, was a custodian of money and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. CoveleskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Schultz v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Buckley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. AmmonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Wilson v. NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Lee v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. WelchelNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- Froding v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.