Legal Opinion

People v. Marez

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 4, 2002No. 00SC695PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats

The People petitioned for review of the court of appeals' judgment reversing the trial court's denial of postconviction relief, In his motion pursuant to Crim. P. 85(c), the defendant objected to the inclusion of a mandatory period of parole, of which he had not been advised at the time of his plea, in the sentence he received after violating the terms of his stipulation to a deferred judgment and sentence. The court of appeals rejected the People's contention that the additional period of parole was not a direct consequence of the defendant's plea because it attached to his sentence only…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Theodore Baker v. Frederick Finkbeiner, Warden, Pontiac Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. Thomas G. Parry Bh-2648 v. Frederick RosemeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. People v. BirdsongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. DarlingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. People v. GreslColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  4. People v. JacksonColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API