Legal Opinion
MacKintosh v. Jack Matthews and Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1993No. 21807Published
1Opinion of the Court
855 P.2d 549 (1993)
Richard MACKINTOSH and Lynn Mackintosh, Appellants,
v.
JACK MATTHEWS AND COMPANY, Pat Hansen, California Federal Savings and Loan Association, dba California Federal Savings, Nevada Division and Preston R. Clark, Respondents.
No. 21807.
Supreme Court of Nevada.
July 8, 1993.
Peter H. Cuttitta, Reno, for appellants.
Jones, Jones, Close & Brown and Richard F. Holley, Reno, for respondents Jack Matthews and Pat Hansen.
Clark & Dickey, Reno, for respondents California Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n and Preston R. Clark.
OPINION
ROSE, Chief Justice:
Summary judgment was granted in favor of…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Stemple v. DobsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Wilhite v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Wilhite v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.