Commonwealth v. Stanton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This is an appeal from the order dismissing appellant’s Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA) petition after a hearing. Appellant contends trial counsel was ineffective: (1) for failing to object to the trial court’s instruction to the jury concerning malice and second degree murder; (2) for failing to object to numerous improper comments by the prosecutor or for failing to raise such issues in post-verdict motions or on direct appeal; and (3) for failing to file a timely written motion to dismiss the action due to a violation of Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100. We disagree with appellant and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. McCutchenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. TrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. IgnatavichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. RawlsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.