Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stanton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1983No. 3307PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order dismissing appellant’s Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA) petition after a hearing. Appellant contends trial counsel was ineffective: (1) for failing to object to the trial court’s instruction to the jury concerning malice and second degree murder; (2) for failing to object to numerous improper comments by the prosecutor or for failing to raise such issues in post-verdict motions or on direct appeal; and (3) for failing to file a timely written motion to dismiss the action due to a violation of Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100. We disagree with appellant and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. McCutchenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. TrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. IgnatavichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. RawlsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API