Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Hampden Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1849PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTenney, J.

— The ninth article of the by-laws of the company, provides among other things, that if the assured shall have sold or alienated the property in whole or in part, without having transferred the policy to the purchaser or the alienee, with the consent of the company, then the policy shall be void and the whole amount of the premium shall be forfeited to the company. The case agreed by the parties does not show, that in the sale or alienation made, (if any was made,) by the plaintiff, of the property insured, he had in any manner the consent of the company. The question upon this branch of She…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Traders Insurance v. NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Malloy v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939
  3. Card v. Phœnix InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API