Legal Opinion

United States v. Manuel R. Sambro

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 26, 1971No. 23875Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing En Banc

Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, LEV-ENTHAL, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, ROBB and WILKEY, Circuit Judges.

2Per curiam

The motion for rehearing en banc initiated by a member of the Court in regular active service is denied, a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure).

BAZELON, Chief Judge:

In view of the importance of the question presented by this case, I asked the court to consider rehearing the case en banc on the court’s own motion. Fed. R.App.P. 35(a). The…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  5. Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API