Legal Opinion

Lemus v. CMH Homes, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided July 12, 2011No. Civil Action C-11-159PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JANIS GRAHAM JACK, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are Defendants Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc., CMH Homes, Inc., Clayton Homes, Inc., and Bruce Robin Moore’s Joint Motion to Compel Arbitration. (D.E. 21, D.E. 27). For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED.

All claims asserted by Plaintiff Jesus Lemus and all claims asserted by Intervenor Vickie Long are to be decided by binding arbitration. 9 U.S.C. § 4. The Defendants shall bear the cost of arbitration, and the venue for arbitration shall be Corpus Christi, Texas.

In addition,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re Weekley Homes, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chun Ping Turng v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  2. Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. v. MilkenDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2014
  3. Jallo v. Resurgent Capital Services, LPDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2015
  4. Leeper v. Altice USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API