Legal Opinion
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. v. Milken
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided February 4, 2014No. Civil Action No. SA-13-CA-724-XRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.
Defendants move to transfer this case to the district court for the District of Delaware pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (docket no. 18) or, alternatively, to dismiss this case for improper venue (docket no. 38). After careful consideration, the Court will grant the motion to transfer.
I. Background
Plaintiff Scantron is a Delaware corporation, and Plaintiff Harland Clarke Holdings (“Harland Clarke”) is Scantron’s parent company based in San Antonio, Texas. Scantron alleges that it is also headquartered in San Antonio, but Defendants dispute this fact and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Silvis v. Ambit Energy, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Peterson v. Evapco, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Hanover InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2015
- Anthony A. Rieder Ed Rapee III And Cadbury Solutions, LLC AND Kenny Woods v. Alan Meeker and CQuentia Series, LLC AND Anthony A. Rieder Ed Rapee III And Cadbury Solutions, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
- Peterson v. Evapco, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.