Legal Opinion

Bursch v. Beardsley & Piper

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1991No. Civ. 5-85-202Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM

RENNER, District Judge.

On April 24, 1991, the Court heard oral argument on various post-trial matters related to the entry of judgment in this case. The Court took under advisement and requested supplemental briefing on the issue of whether defendant and third-party plaintiff Beardsley & Piper should be awarded prejudgment interest on its contribution claim against third-party defendant DeZu-rik.

Based on the file, record and arguments of counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Beardsley & Piper's motion for prejudgment interest on its contribution claim against DeZurik is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Schunk v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Milbank Mutual Insurance v. Village of Rose CreekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Germann v. F.L. Smithe Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API