Legal Opinion

James v. Kula Development Corp.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1966No. 4598PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendants have appealed to this court from an order entered May 27, 1966, denying their motion filed April 12, 1966, and granting plaintiff’s motion of April 21, 1966 for a determination nunc pro tunc giving finality to a summary judgment previously entered in a multiple claim situation where H.R.C.P., Rule 54(b), required such determination if the judgment was to be deemed final. On the same day, May 27, 1966, there was entered an amended summary judgment pursuant to said order. However, there is no question of any mistake in the notice of appeal. Defendants deliberately did not appeal from…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Biggins v. Oltmer Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  2. Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Claybrook Drilling Company, a Corporation v. Divanco, Inc., and Henry D. Hughes, in the Matter of Divanco, Inc., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  4. Stafford v. DickisonHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Sidney Rabekoff, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Acorn Industries, Inc. v. Lazere & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stratis v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API