Legal Opinion

Ott v. United States

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided January 8, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00756Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ___________________________ MICHAEL OTT, Plaintiff, v. No. CIV 19-756 WJ/SMV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO INCREASE AD DAMNUM CLAUSE THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Increase Ad Damnum Clause, filed August 26, 2020 (Doc. 28). Having reviewed the parties’ briefing and the applicable law, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion is not well-taken and, therefore is denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff brings this case under the Federal Tort…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Donna Reilly, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Richard Allgeier, Maria D. Boldrick, Intervening v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Low v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  4. Vincent William Michels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Roy L. Fraysier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API