Legal Opinion

Roy L. Fraysier v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 23, 1985No. 84-5121PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Circuit Judge:

In the Federal Tort Claims Act, which provided a limited waiver of governmental immunity, Congress provided that no tort action could be instituted against the United States for a sum in excess of that presented to the federal agency which committed the tort, except where the increased amount is based on newly discovered evidence not reasonably discoverable when the agency claim was presented, or on in*479tervening facts. In this case involving injuries resulting from a swine flu vaccine, the question is whether increased knowledge of plaintiffs physical injuries amounts to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Husovsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  2. McDonald v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. United States v. Grover AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. Rabovsky v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
  5. Fraysier v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1983

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Antonio Lebron v. United States of America, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Low v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. Vincent William Michels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Ludmilla Zurba v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API