Legal Opinion
Kempe v. Dometic Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 21, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-404 MMSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Ursula and Udo Kempe have filed this diversity action alleging personal injury and property damage. Their complaint stems from an incident involving the refilling and lighting of an alcohol-fueled stove supplied by defendant The Dometie Corporation (“Dometie”). Plaintiffs aver that Dometie Corporation is strictly liable in tort for failure to warn as to the safe fueling and relighting procedure for the stove.
Dometie has moved for a pretrial ruling on the admissibility of results of a serum alcohol test performed on Ursula Kempe.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Adeline M. Bruno v. W.B. Saunders Company and Cbs Educational and Professional Publishing, a Division of Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Sandra Carrick, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael J. Carrick, Deceased v. Zurich-American Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SeniorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Hulmes v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- People v. GreenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Straley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- People v. GreenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997