Legal Opinion

Omnetics, Inc. v. Radiant Technology Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1989No. CX-88-2355PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD D. MULALLY, Acting Judge.

Omnetics, Inc. appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV). Appellant sustained property damage when a laboratory immersion heater, manufactured by respondent Radiant Technology Corporation, overheated and started a fire on appellant’s premises. By special verdict, the jury determined that the heater was not defectively designed, but that respondent’s failure to provide adequate warnings or instructions for safe use rendered it in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Alholm v. WiltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Holm v. Sponco Mfg., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andren v. White-Rodgers Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Janke v. Duluth & Northeastern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Hegna v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
  4. Andren v. White-Rodgers Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Hernandez v. Ecolab, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API